There Goes the Big Bang

This post kind of follows on from my article Do We Need Proof?, where I discuss the scientific theory that a God/Higher Power exists, as without the existence of a single powerful source the universe would not have been born.

On my quest to learn more, I came across a news piece, relating to a publication of a new quantum physics paper, which reports that the Big Bang Theory is not as cut and dried as once believed – perhaps adding further weight to a “something else”?

The scientists state that String Theory (in my very rudimentary nutshell is the belief that “strings” are the basis of every single solitary thing in the universe) has never been able to explain in the Big Bang event and there are too many holes in the theory.

Yet the scientists dismissal of the Big Bang Theory gets rather confusing, as they draw on actual matter/molecular analogies to describe the inception of our universe.

In an attempt to describe their new quantum graphity theory, the researchers from Australia’s RMIT state we should think of the pre-universe as water which has been cooled to create ice. This quantum graphity model uses the notion that, in the early days, the universe was fluid and without “form” – just like liquid – and once cooled it crystallised.

This quagmire turns even more bizarre when the theoretical physics researcher James Quach adds, “In the beginning there wasn’t even space, space did not exist because there was no form.” into the mix, leaving my brain in tatters and on the verge of explosive, cataclysmic oblivion!

Just to surmise:

Our non-universe was without form, yet a form formed from our non-universe, and subsequently formed our universe!

I am hanging up my typing fingers and going for a well needed lie down now, in a warm cosy parallel universe with wardrobes,  talking lions and magical Turkish delight………….